I’m reading a novel–that shall remain unnamed for now–that has a lot of chapters, each with multiple subchapters, and all with thousands of characters with multiple names and aliases and Internet handles.
I have a vague idea most of the time about what’s happening–cyber warfare–and a feeling that there are multiple good guys in multiple alphabet soup federal agencies as well as multiple bad guys in a slough of nasty groups all of who are either trying to steal secrets and/or plant bombs OR who are trying to keep people from stealing secrets and/or plant bombs.
What I seldom know is which character is doing what. Sometimes characters are referred to by the first name, last name only, or code name. Often, all in the same paragraph, as in “Johnson stopped his car in a no-parking zone and hung his FBI creds around his neck. As Bob edged closer to the barricades he noted a police helo hovering overhead, then, and incoming call, ‘Cyber 1,’ he answered.”
Ack. Are Bob and Johnson the same person? Yes, but it’s often hard to tell.
I looked up the reviews for this book on Amazon and the most common complaint was too many characters and the fact that new characters kept being introduced throughout the book.
No offense to the names in other countries, but a large number of foreign names, (first/last/pet/title only) doesn’t help the reader keep track of everyone, especially when some of these people are bad guys and are using phoney names.
I’m losing my patience with this and am surprised by the reader reviews on Amazon where people said, “Best book since sliced bread” and “Well written with a lot of character depth.”
Some people read the book while drunk or stoned and that probably accounted for the glowing, five-star reviews. Other people read the book because it was the only new book in the house (my situation) and just decided at some point it didn’t matter who was going what as long as what they were doing was really cool.
If you wrote this book, shame on you for an anal amount of complexity.
6 thoughts on “A thousand characters: give me a break”
I just finished a book where the author introduced a few point of view characters in the middle of the book that had nothing to do with anything. I have a hunch this was one of a sort-of series where each book starred a different character and the author just wanted to touch base with other characters in the series, but there are much better ways than doing so. Like you, this is a book I probably would never have read, but here I am, and here it is.
I don’t see much good in touching base just for the sake of touching base.
Neither do I. Even worse, I just finished a book in a series where the subplot of a supposedly dead woman being found alive was never resolved. The book ended before we found out anything about her. Such a cheat!
Subplots? Meh. Most readers take them as a dime a dozen.
Ha ha ha!
What is this book? I think we should be told …
(BTW – it sounds like just my sort of thing – although I am struggling bigtime with Book 1 of Game of Thrones, which should’ve been just my sort of thing and was recommended to me by several friends as such.)
Naah, I don’t think I’m going to say who wrote it, but if you figure it out, let me know. The title begins with an “N.” I gave up on Games of Thrones because I got tired of the violence and thought it was over the top, especially women getting raped all the time. I also skipped the film version.
Comments are closed.