‘The Running Grave: A Cormoran Strike Novel’ by Robert Galbraith

I’m happy to see the upcoming release of a new Robert Galbraith detective novel, the seventh in the series of which I’ve read all but one.  The main character, Cormoran Strike, runs a detective agency that does its work without hacking into databases or traffic cams, but by old-fashioned boots on the ground, interviews, and stakeouts.

This assessment of the novels is especially apt:  “At Five Books, we take crime novels seriously, and the Cormoran Strike books are highly recommended for anyone who is into the genre. The tricks to keep you guessing or the surprise about ‘whodunnit’ are not quite as mind-boggling as Agatha Christie, but perhaps more realistic. The plotting is solid and satisfying, and doesn’t grate like in all too many contemporary crime novels.”

From the Publisher

“Private Detective Cormoran Strike is contacted by a worried father whose son, Will, has gone to join a religious cult in the depths of the Norfolk countryside.

“The Universal Humanitarian Church is, on the surface, a peaceable organization that campaigns for a better world. Yet Strike discovers that beneath the surface there are deeply sinister undertones and unexplained deaths.

“In order to try to rescue Will, Strike’s business partner, Robin Ellacott, decides to infiltrate the cult, and she travels to Norfolk to live incognito among its members. But in doing so, she is unprepared for the dangers that await her there or for the toll it will take on her. . .

“Utterly page-turning, The Running Grave moves Strike’s and Robin’s story forward in this epic, unforgettable seventh installment of the series.”

The books are long and I see that as good. Running Grave, to be released September 26th by Mulholland Books, gives you 960 pages of whodunnit. It’s listed by Amazon in the “International Mystery And Crime,” “Private Investigator,” and “Cozy Mysteries” categories.

–Malcolm

Malcolm R. Campbell is the author of the Florida Folk Magic Series, available at a savings in this four-book Kindle volume.

‘American Prometheus’ – Remembering the book that inspired the movie

“Oppenheimer’s warnings were ignored—and ultimately, he was silenced. Like that rebellious Greek god Prometheus—who stole fire from Zeus and bestowed it upon humankind, Oppenheimer gave us atomic fire. But then, when he tried to control it, when he sought to make us aware of its terrible dangers, the powers-that-be, like Zeus, rose up in anger to punish him.” American Prometheus by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin (2005)

Before the United States was done with Julius Robert Oppenheimer (April 22, 1904 – February 18, 1967), he was declared a security risk by the Eisenhower administration. You learn this on the first page of this definitive, Pulitzer-Prize-winning book about a mystic and theoretical physicist who was as complex as his Nobel-Prize-worthy work that was far flung from nuclear weapons.

From the Publisher

American Prometheus is the first full-scale biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer, “father of the atomic bomb,” the brilliant, charismatic physicist who led the effort to capture the awesome fire of the sun for his country in time of war. Immediately after Hiroshima, he became the most famous scientist of his generation–one of the iconic figures of the twentieth century, the embodiment of modern man confronting the consequences of scientific progress.

He was the author of a radical proposal to place international controls over atomic materials–an idea that is still relevant today. He opposed the development of the hydrogen bomb and criticized the Air Force’s plans to fight an infinitely dangerous nuclear war. In the now almost-forgotten hysteria of the early 1950s, his ideas were anathema to powerful advocates of a massive nuclear buildup, and, in response, Atomic Energy Commission chairman Lewis Strauss, Superbomb advocate Edward Teller and FBI director J. Edgar Hoover worked behind the scenes to have a hearing board find that Oppenheimer could not be trusted with America’s nuclear secrets.

American Prometheus sets forth Oppenheimer’s life and times in revealing and unprecedented detail. Exhaustively researched, it is based on thousands of records and letters gathered from archives in America and abroad, on massive FBI files and on close to a hundred interviews with Oppenheimer’s friends, relatives and colleagues.

We follow him from his earliest education at the turn of the twentieth century at New York City’s Ethical Culture School, through personal crises at Harvard and Cambridge universities. Then to Germany, where he studied quantum physics with the world’s most accomplished theorists; and to Berkeley, California, where he established, during the 1930s, the leading American school of theoretical physics, and where he became deeply involved with social justice causes and their advocates, many of whom were communists. Then to Los Alamos, New Mexico, where he transformed a bleak mesa into the world’s most potent nuclear weapons laboratory–and where he himself was transformed. And finally, to the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, which he directed from 1947 to 1966.

American Prometheus is a rich evocation of America at midcentury, a new and compelling portrait of a brilliant, ambitious, complex and flawed man profoundly connected to its major events–the Depression, World War II and the Cold War. It is at once biography and history, and essential to our understanding of our recent past–and of our choices for the future.

From Kirkus Reviews

That Oppenheimer (1904–67) was a rare genius is beyond doubt; his colleagues at CalTech, Göttingen and Los Alamos were impressed to the point of being cowed by his intellect, and “Oppie” was far ahead of even his professors in the new world of quantum theory. He was a rare bird in other ways as well. A child of privilege whose very luggage excited discussion among his cash-strapped European colleagues, he identified early with left-wing causes and was reportedly better read in the classics of Marxism than most Communist theoreticians; and, though a leftist, he expressed enough fondness for the U.S. that those European colleagues sometimes thought him a chauvinist. Worldly in many ways, he was something of a naïf. In time, he shed some of his clumsiness and became the model of a committed intellectual, unusually generous in sharing credit with students and colleagues and able to wear his achievements lightly. (“I can make it clearer,” he once remarked of a thorny physics problem, “but I can’t make it simpler.”) The authors lucidly explain Oppenheimer’s many scientific accomplishments and the finer points of quantum mechanics. More, they examine his life in a political context, for, though one of the fathers of the atomic bomb, Oppenheimer warned against its proliferation and noted, as early as 1946, that our major cities were now susceptible to terrorist attack, the only defense being a screwdriver—to open “each and every crate or suitcase.” His prescience and conscience cost him dearly: Oppie was effectively blacklisted for more than a decade and rehabilitated only at the end of his too-short life.

A swiftly moving narrative full of morality tales and juicy gossip. One of the best scientific biographies to appear in recent years.

If the Christopher Nolan feature film has captured your attention and interest in the father of the bomb and you want to know more, American Prometheus is a good starting point. As Wikipedia notes, “The film was released on the same day as Barbie, a fantasy comedy film directed by Greta Gerwig based on Mattel’s Barbie fashion dolls and media franchise, and distributed by Warner Bros. Due to the tonal and genre contrast between the two films, many social media users created memes about how the two films appealed to different audiences, and how they should be viewed as a double feature. The trend was dubbed ‘Barbenheimer’. In an interview with La Vanguardia, Cillian Murphy endorsed the phenomenon, saying ‘My advice would be for people to go see both, on the same day. If they are good films, then that’s cinema’s gain.'”

–Malcolm

Where were you October 3, 1992 when someone shouted, ‘Live from New York, it’s Saturday Night!’? 

Two days ago, a Time Magazine story headlined: “The Controversial Saturday Night Live Performance That Made Sinéad O’Connor an Icon.” I agree, it did , but that wasn’t the reaction at the time. Then, and probably up to the day she died, the reaction was pure hatred and scorn for her protest against the Catholic Church about a problem that had for years been obvious to everyone. Even her friends had nothing good to say about her on October 4th and afterwards.

She followed a long tradition of protest singers that went back to Pete Seeger, Joan Baez, Bob Dylan and almost everyone else who was singing during the Vietnam War years.

According to Time, “Speaking with the New York Times in 2021, O’Connor said she had no regrets, though the backlash was overwhelming. ‘I’m not sorry I did it. It was brilliant. But it was very traumatizing. It was open season on treating me like a crazy b-tch.'” 

Jeremy Smith, writing in Film said, “My memory is tainted by the ensuing smear campaign, a campaign that did not end until today, when Sinéad O’Connor died at the infuriatingly young age of 56 – and I’m probably a fool to believe this denigration will cease just because she’s not around to defend herself anymore. I’ve never seen a popular musician face such unremitting scorn. Not even close. But O’Connor — contrary to the narrative seared into our psyches by a media that could not bear her scorched-earth declaration that the Catholic Church is, charitable works be damned, a factory of institutionally abetted child abuse — never stopped speaking her truth. That continues to be our truth and our shame.”

Well said, and I hope that in time those who slandered her will one day see that she bravely spoke the truth, a truth that most people preferred not to mention.

–Malcolm

 

 

 

Thunder and Lightning Salad

Sara Bradley, who won the recent episode of  “Chopped” (a TV show competition on the food network) representing chefs from the south, served a Thunder and Lightning salad. This easy-to-make salad doesn’t have a Wikipedia entry, so I can’t show you a free-to-use photo. The judges liked it, and as they talked about it, I realized that it’s been years since I had it.

You can find recipes all over the Internet for it, most with variations from the original that, while fine for experimentation, aren’t the standard which includes several tomatoes, several cucumbers, one Bermuda onion, white vinegar (1/2 cup), and sugar (1/2 cup or a little less to taste).  I avoid recipes that include bell peppers since the pepper flavor permeates the whole shebang.  White wine, hot sauce, herbs, and Canola oil: forget it.

Traditionally, the vegetables are cut into large pieces. That is, the tomatoes are cut into wedges, and the cucumbers are peeled and cut into fat slices. The onions are sliced the way you would if you were putting them on a hamburger and cut in half. These are left large so people who don’t like raw onion can pick them out.

Mix up the vegetables and onion in a large bowl. Stir the vinegar and sugar together and then drizzle this over the salad and refrigerate overnight.

This salad goes well with minute steak, pork chops, and even barbecue–or whatever catches your fancy. I have no idea how Sara Bradley made this salad on “Chopped,” so I’ve tried to give you the most basic form. Some people swap Vidalia or other sweet onions for the Bermudas.

And, so sorry for the lack of a photo of the salad.

–Malcolm

WH discloses Biden has watched ‘Barbie’ thirteen times

Washington, D.C., July 26/2023, Star-Gazer News Service–President Biden, who admits he bought the first Barbie doll when it came out in 1959, told reporters that people “who suspect they’re losing their marbles will be returned to sanity to the greatest extent possible by interacting with a Barbie doll collection,” has viewed the new “Barbie” fantasy/comedy film thirteen times.

In spite of stories on Fox News, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said that charges that Biden stole Vice President Kamala D. Harris’ Barbie doll collection and hid it in the White House China (Dish) Room are “bloody false.”

According to Jean-Pierre, “The  President’s doll collection is large enough to withstand acts of God, so he has no need of filching Kamala’s dolls.”

Informed sources say that Biden’s doll collection has been common knowledge amongst reporters who, generally speaking, never mentioned it in print since it would sound like fake news.

Biden, who shared his collection with the 44th U.S. President, Barack Obama for security reasons, said that “while “Barbie” is the epitome of a joyous, transforming movie, “Oppenheimer focuses on the negative, Republican-style view of the cosmos. What sane person goes around saying, ‘Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.’?”

White House insiders have sworn on a stack of Bibles that the President requires the First Lady, Jill Biden, to wear costumes made popular by the Barbie dolls while the often sits at his Oval Office desk dressed as Ken.

“It’s so sweet,” a White House clerk said, “because it’s human and defines the administration’s approach to political issues.”

Story by Jock Stewart, Special Investigative Reporter

ADDITIONAL PARENTS JOIN LAWSUIT AGAINST BOOK BANS IN FLORIDA’S ESCAMBIA COUNTY

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – PEN.ORG

(PENSACOLA, FL)— Five additional parents today joined a first-of-its-kind federal lawsuit filed earlier this spring challenging the removals and restrictions of books from libraries in a Florida school district that violate their rights to free speech and equal protection under the law.

The amended suit, led by the free expression organization PEN America, Penguin Random House and a diverse group of authors and parents of Escambia County students, seeks to ensure access to books on a wide range of topics with a wide range of viewpoints. The plaintiffs are represented by Ballard Spahr LLP and Protect Democracy, a non-partisan, pro-democracy group. Read the amended complaint, filed today, here.

This brings the number of parent plaintiffs in the case to seven, with 10 children from diverse backgrounds in elementary, middle and high school. The suit was filed originally on May 17 against the Escambia County School Board asking for books to be returned to school library shelves where they belong. After the complaint was filed, the plaintiffs were granted time to amend it with additional plaintiffs.

“As a Black mother of two teenage girls, I know how important it is for our children to have access to books like The Freedom Writers Diary and Beloved,” said Carin Smith, a parent who joined  the lawsuit. “I respect the right of parents to make decisions with and for their own children. In my opinion, we should not shy away from the real, raw struggles this country has faced, and my girls shouldn’t be deprived access to books on those issues because our stories make someone else uncomfortable.”

Benjamin Glass, another parent joining the suit, noted, “Someone with a master’s degree in library science, also known as a librarian, should be deciding what’s in libraries – not politicians. Parents, of course, should be involved in what is in their own child’s best interest to read. But they shouldn’t be making decisions on behalf of other people’s children. You parent your child, I’ll parent mine, and we’ll let librarians do their jobs. That sounds good to me.”

Since the lawsuit was filed in May, the Escambia School District has continued its policies of removing books from school libraries. In that time an additional 21 book titles have been challenged and 17 have been restricted, including Pulitzer Prize winning Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides, the landmark graphic novel Watchmen by Alan Moore, and the horror novel It by Stephen King.

“School officials shouldn’t use their authority to force their own ideological convictions on students,” said Suzanne Nossel, CEO of PEN America. “The new plaintiffs have kids in middle and high schools, going through a pivotal time of learning, exploration and intellectual development. We should not be sending them the message that books are dangerous. By defending their freedom to read, we will ensure that schools remain places where students are exposed to complex ideas and stories instead of being taught that society does not trust them enough to allow them to pick up a book.”

The authors involved in the suit, all of whom have either already had their books removed by the district and/or restricted from student access, include author and children’s book illustrator Sarah Brannen, young adult fiction authors David Levithan, George M. Johnson and Ashley Hope Pérez, and children’s book author Kyle Lukoff, all of whom have published works focusing on identities that are historically underrepresented in school libraries.

Lynn Oberlander, counsel at Ballard Spahr LLP, noted, “In removing and restricting access to over 150 books from the libraries on the basis that they expressed disfavored viewpoints, the school board in Escambia County violated the constitutional rights of students, parents, authors and publishers. We are pursuing this case to vindicate those rights, and to stop agents of government from limiting access to ideas and perspectives with which it disagrees in our nation’s schools.”

“The school board is removing books from the school library based on the political views of a small minority,” said Shalini Agarwal, counsel for Protect Democracy. “In removing and restricting the books, the school board is overriding the recommendations of district review committees designed to evaluate books with parent and community feedback. This isn’t simply an affront to parents, it’s a violation of the First Amendment and Equal Protection Clause.”

The Forgotten Element of Story: The Author | Jane Friedman Blog

“Have you ever thought you put too much of yourself into your fiction? You read through your manuscript and, woah, you are all over the page. It’s not just that characters reflect your own struggles, hopes, and personality traits, it’s that your hopes and fears are laid bare on the page. So you do your best to mute yourself. You alter characters, blunt your unadulterated emotions, make things a little less passionate. Writers aren’t supposed to put too much of themselves into their story, right?

“Or maybe you’re the opposite. You don’t want your writing to seem biased, clouded by your own experiences. You shape your characters into people who don’t share your background, beliefs, or love for puppies in teacups because good writers keep distance between themselves and the page.”

 

Source: The Forgotten Element of Story: The Author | Jane Friedman

Personally, I hope more emerging authors and students in writing programs will find their way to this post. If you’ve been reading this blog for a while, you know that one of my favorite quotes comes from Virginia Woolf’s novel Orlando: ““Every secret of a writer’s soul, every experience of his life, every quality of his mind is written large in his works.” The reason I like this post from Jane Friedman’s blog is that author is asking you to acknowledge this and own it rather than trying to stifle it.

In short, the “you” that you allow on the page will determine whether the story sings or falls flat. She asks you to examine your own backstory, your values, and your impact.  Abernathy is spot on with this advice.

–Malcolm

 

One thing and (possibly) another

  • I’ve enjoyed Diana Gabaldon’s “Outlander” series and am just about done reading the latest installment Go Tell The Bees That I Am Gone. I’m enjoying the novel: it has the series’ typically interesting characters, historically accurate themes, and the kind of humor that develops when characters have been together throughout many books. Even so, I’m a bit disappointed in this novel that’s set in North Carolina as the revolutionary war begins. Basically, I think the book has too much backstory almost as though we haven’t read the rest of the series and need to be brought up to date on what’s happened to everyone since the initial novel was published in  1991. The current novel is number nine out of a planned ten books. We need more action in this one.
  • When I first heard about the “Barbie” movie, I assumed it was going to be all fluff like the OLD (1965) “Beach Blanket Bingo” and the 1989-2001 TV series “Baywatch.” What a surprise, “Barbie” is not only doing well at the box office but has gotten some good reviews such as this one on NPR: “‘Barbie’ review: Sometimes corporate propaganda can be fun as hell.” Here’s an excerpt: “Barbie isn’t just a movie that could never fully escape out from under the weight of its artistic compromises. It’s a hoot, a feast for the eyes and ears. Sarah Greenwood’s production design is sensorially astounding; Barbie Land is conceived as it’s appeared in kids’ imaginations for decades – both tangible (plastic shower, toaster, or car) and intangible (invisible water, toast, or motor). The makeup team confidently balances an essence of plasticity without drowning in it to the point of the uncanny. There are musical numbers and A+ cameos. (I’d love to get Lizzo to sing-narrate my life, too, please!)”
  • I’ve recorded the 1971 movie “Klute,” a neo-noir thriller that I saw in a theater when it was released, and liked everything about it. I like noir a lot and neo-noir almost as much. I don’t know whether my wife will watch this one with me because she still hasn’t forgiven Fonda for her travels to Vietnam during the war. I haven’t either, but I see the movie as separate from its star’s Oscar-winning performance. According to Wikipedia, “Klute was widely praised by critics for its screenplay and Fonda’s performance, though some criticized Pakula’s unconventional direction. On review aggregator Rotten TomatoesKlute holds an approval rating of 93% based on 43 reviews, with an average rating of 8.2/10. The website’s critical consensus reads: ‘Donald Sutherland is coolly commanding and Jane Fonda a force of nature in Klute, a cuttingly intelligent thriller that generates its most agonizing tension from its stars’ repartee.’ On Metacritic, which assigns a rating to reviews, the film has a weighted average score of 81 out of 100, based on 47 critics, indicating ‘universal acclaim.'”
  • Are you planning to watch “Oppenheimer”? I’m thinking it’s one of those must-see films because it focuses on an important part of our history. Wikipedia writes that “The film was released on the same day as Barbie, a fantasy comedy film directed by Greta Gerwig based on Mattel‘s Barbie fashion dolls and media franchise, and distributed by Warner Bros. Due to the tonal and genre contrast between the two films, many social media users created memes about how the two films appealed to different audiences, and how they should be viewed as a double feature. The trend was dubbed “Barbenheimer“. In an interview with La VanguardiaCillian Murphy endorsed the phenomenon, saying “My advice would be for people to go see both, on the same day. If they are good films, then that’s cinema’s gain.” If I went to a theater to see “Barbie,” I’d have to wear my Batman costume to avoid attracting attention. As for “Oppenheimer,” I’ll probably watch it even though I think the bomb should not have been used against Japan in World War II.

Malcolm

I love moonshiners and dislike feds

I have legal moonshine in the house and think it’s darned good. What amuses me is the fact that some of today’s legal distillers advertise that they’re using the same recipe they used when the family made moonshine illegally. Midnight Moon Moonshine says on its website, for example,  that “Midnight Moon is inspired by Junior Johnson’s family moonshine recipe and – true to the roots of moonshine – it is made from 100% American corn and handcrafted in small batches.”

In movies like “Thunder Road,” I always support the moonshiners because I think messing with them is an example of government overreach that began with the Whiskey Rebellion of 1791 when the new federal government taxed booze to pay for the war. My question then, and now, always was how is it fair to tax one product rather than levying a tax on all projects? Not that I would like that any better.

Made in 1958, “Thunder Road” became a cult favorite, especially in parts of the county with a moonshine tradition. When one of my brothers bought some mountain property in North Carolina years ago, he was told that there were probably stills there; just don’t go looking for them.

Smith in 1960

My wife and I watch the movie from time to time. I like it, except for the ending which I consider as an example of illegal federal force. (Like the ending of “Bonnie and Clyde.”) But aside from that, it’s a bit of nostalgia with Mitchum’s typical natural style of acting and the added benefit of having jazz singer Keely Smith in the cast and singing the theme song “The Whippoorwill.” Mitchum co-wrote the song. Smith is probably best remembered for her song–sung with her husband Louis Prima–“That Old Black Magic.”

In 2012, there was a Thunder Road Festival in Roane County, Tennessee,  but I can’t find any mention of it in subsequent years: “One of Tennessee’s fastest growing festivals, Rockwood’s Thunder Road Festival is held each April in downtown Rockwood, TN.  The day-long festival captures the element of Rockwood’s past as a location on the notorious Thunder Road.”

And then, of course, there’s NASCAR,  but that’s another story.

Malcolm

I left my heart in San Francisco

With the death of Tony Bennett who died today at 96 a small portion of the hearts of those of us who were born in the Bay Area also died because for us his signature song became our signature song and  a haunting memory of where we came from and where many family members lived on for years after we left. We went back often during my pre-school years and then I want back later when I was in the Navy and had an apartment in the Mission District down a steep hill from my aunt’s apartment, the place where she lived when I was a child and the place where she still lived when I was stationed acrosss the Bay at the former Alameda Naval Air Station when my ship was in port.

Tony Bennet first sang  “I Left My Heart in San Franscisco” in 1961 at the Fairmont Hotel. Perhaps KABL, my favorite SF station was there. I was in Florida then and not a happy camper at being pulled away from California when my father’s job  brought us to Tallahassee. In many ways, I never recovered from that that move because the Florida Panhandle, though beautiful in many ways that I learned to love, was just too alien for a kid who thought he’d grow up many miles due west.

Sadly, I can never go back. San Francisco became to expensive and, like the state, was totally messed up by the  politicians. And yet, Tony Bennett kept the dream of going back alive with that song and with his recording longevity with Lady Gaga and other artists over the years. He was my connection to times gone by.  The cord has finally  been cut.

Malcolm