Skip to content

Budget Falls Short for Parks; Glacier Plowing Facilitated by Donation

from the National Parks and Conservation Association

NPCAlogoBackground: The release of President Obama’s 2014 budget April 10 proposes that the National Park Service budget would increase by $56.6 million over FY12, but the increase is partially offset by programmatic decreases to park base operations. The proposal includes important investments but also provides a reduction of nearly a hundred staff in park operations.

“The National Park Service is experiencing deep impacts from the sequester and other continued reductions. This year will be the most challenging in some time for national park superintendents who will have fewer rangers and smaller budgets to manage each park from Yellowstone to Acadia. Funding the operations of the National Park Service needs to be more of a priority than it has been to date. We’re pleased that the President recognizes the need to reverse the mindless sequester, but it will take more than that recognition to address the reality facing national parks.”

“The sequester has already cut more than $130 million from the National Park Service budget, forcing places like Yellowstone, Acadia, Independence Hall, and Cape Cod National Seashore to delay seasonal openings, close visitor centers, picnic areas, and campgrounds, and eliminate ranger positions that are critical to protecting endangered species and historic buildings, as well as greeting park visitors and school groups. Further cuts will only impair the national park experience.

“National parks draw international tourists and are economic engines that support more than $30budget billion in spending and more than a quarter million jobs. Yet they suffer from an annual operating shortfall exceeding half a billion dollars and a maintenance backlog of many billions more. And in today’s dollars, the Park Service budget has now declined by more than 20 percent over the last decade.

“We need the President and Congress to make sure America’s national parks are open and well-staffed and nothing in this budget provides us with any confidence that will happen. Our national parks are not just great destinations to visit, they are our national treasures that should be treated with honor. They drive the economy for many rural and urban communities. The severe under-funding of our most prized places needs to be reversed. We hope to work with the President and Congress as they debate how to repair a failed federal budgeting process to better address the true causes of the nation’s deficits and better serve our national parks and the American people.”

Glacier National Park

NPS Glacier Photo

NPS Glacier Photo

According to NPS Glacier, “The park’s base budget of approximately $13.5 million was reduced by $682,000. The park must absorb that cut in the remaining months of this fiscal year that ends September 30.”

Due to Congress’ failure to adequately support the parks, budgets were already far short of basic infrastructure and operating requirements. Cutting funding further through a failure of the federal budgetary process adds insult to injury. Inasmuch as jobs and tourism income in areas with parks benefit greatly, any reduction of park hours, season dates, and attractions impacts more than the parks themselves.

Fortunately, a donation to NPS Glacier by the Glacier National Park Conservancy has kept budget cuts from delaying the spring plowing of the Going to the Sun Road. However, visitors will see impacts elsewhere:

  • Delayed trail access and decreased trail maintenance,
  • Reduction in native plant restoration,
  • Reduced shoulder-season access to campgrounds and visitor centers,
  • Decrease in entrance station hours,
  • Less maintenance work on park facilities, roads and utility systems,
  • Limited and delayed emergency response outside the core season,
  • Decreased educational programming and ranger-led activities,
  • Less back-country volunteer coordination,
  • Reduction of revenue from impacted campgrounds, and
  • Reduced partner financial aid assisting interpretive programs resulting from loss of revenue of partner bookstores in park.

What a pity.


  1. Smoky Zeidel #

    Every national park I know of has an affiliated non-profit raising funds for the park. And thank the stars that’s the case; we cannot depend on the government to do so. Which is, as you say, a pity.

    April 23, 2013
    • Those “friends of” groups really help cover the shortfalls. We need more, though, perhaps from some of those celebs who are always buying and selling their multiple multi-million dollar homes. They could write a $682,000 to NPS Glacier without even noticing it.


      April 23, 2013
  2. For the last many years the Federal government has had plenty of money to spend for everything except the old, solid, fundamental things that the country needs. The parks are now starting to feel that misappropriation of funds. Very sad.

    April 23, 2013
    • I started to add a rant about a parent who wanted everyone in the family to cut back as long as the cuts didn’t impact the racetrack money. A lot of those expenses out there are a waste.

      April 23, 2013
      • They are indeed a waste. Money spent on personal agenda items of political favors, not the collective needs of those who provide the money.

        April 23, 2013
        • I don’t know why this isn’t more obvious at election time.

          April 23, 2013
          • Probably because we have to choose between two or three lousy candidates. The same thing that is responsible for much of the low voter turnout.

            April 23, 2013

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: